Roger Award Finalists

What’s Your Choice for Worst Service?

— Check the Roger Award Finalists!

8th December 2009

If you are tired of getting really poor service from a big company, you’ll be interested in the latest from a truly NZ owned and operated group – the Roger Award campaign.

It’s just announced the nine finalists for the 2009 Roger Award—given annually to the worst transnational (TNC) corporation in New Zealand.

The Campaign says the transnational (a corporation which is 25% or more foreign-owned) that gets the award is judged to have had the most negative impact in several key categories.

Campaign Against Foreign Control of NZ

The Roger Award is organised by two Christchurch-based groups, Campaign Against Foreign Control of Aotearoa (CAFCA) and  the GATT Watchdog.

The Campaign says the nine finalists for the 2009Award are (in alphabetical order):

  • · ANZ
  • · BNZ
  • · Infratil,
  • · Newmont
  • · Rio Tinto Aluminium NZ
  • · Rymans
  • · Telecom
  • · Transpacific
  • and Westpac

Two Finalists for Accomplice

And the Campaign has named two finalists for the Accomplice Award:

  • · the Business Round Table
  • and the Auckland City Council and its officials (as part of the nomination of Transpacific Industries).

Telecom, the winner of the 2007 Roger Award, is the only transnational corporation to have been a finalist every year since the Roger Award started 12 years ago (although it has only actually won it twice).

This year it was nominated primarily for its shabby treatment of its phone technicians, whom it is forcing into becoming self-employed contractors.

They will have to carry the costs and risks previously borne by their employer when they were wage workers.

Transpacific is New Entry

Transpacific is the only entry not to have featured before, at least not under that name.

In recent years it bought out Waste Management which, under its previous owners, was a finalist previously.

All the rest have previously been finalists (and BNZ and Westpac were joint winners in 2005).

Tobacco Company Not Bad Enough To Make Grade

This tells you something about these corporate recidivists. In fact this is such a strong field that the defending champion, BAT (British American Tobacco NZ), which won the 2008 Roger, couldn’t even make the finalists.

ANZ was nominated very specifically for its role in the ING frozen funds scandal, which is a continuation from 2008, when it was also a finalist for the same reason.

BNZ and Westpac are there for a variety of sins.

But first and foremost because they have been found guilty of massive tax avoidance in a case that Inland Revenue has brought against all four Australian-owned banks (ANZ and ASB are yet to have their day in court).

The total amount of tax avoided is more than $2 billion.

‘Union Bashing’ by Auckland Firm

Infratil is there again, as it was in 2008, because of union bashing (specifically for locking out Auckland bus drivers by its NZ Bus subsidiary.

Last year it was for NZ Bus locking out its Wellington workers. Do you detect a pattern emerging here?).

Newmont Mining, which was last a finalist in 2003, is there for the same reason – the appalling impact of its gold mine which has left Waihi with a huge hole in the middle of town.

Rio Tinto Aluminium (which is still better known by its former name, Comalco), the 2008 runner up, was nominated for a range of reasons.

‘Corporate Bludger’ says Campaign

The primary reason is for being the biggest corporate bludger in NZ vis a vis its power price.

And for the huge amount that the public will have to pay for every job at the Tiwai Point smelter because the Government is making taxpayers carry the burden of NZ’s carbon emissions, and pay for the biggest carbon emitter in the country.

Rymans, which people mistakenly think of as being New Zealand-owned (the same mistake is made about Infratil), has been a finalist once before and for the same reason: the Campaign says it is a prime example of the ‘For-profit retirement home industry’ and it treats both workers and residents poorly.

Transpacific was nominated for its takeover, aided and abetted by the Auckland City Council and its officials, of the excellent locally owned and run rubbish and recycling operation on Waiheke Island.

Negative Criteria Categories

The Roger campaign says the judging criteria are for the most negative impact in each or all of the following categories:

Economic Dominance – Monopoly, profiteering, tax dodging, cultural imperialism

People – Unemployment, impact on tangata whenua, impact on women, impact on children, abuse of workers/conditions, health and safety of workers and the public

Environment – Environmental damage, abuse of animals

Political interference – Interference in democratic processes, running an ideological crusade.

Judges Include Former Deputy Head of UK Labour Party

The judges are:

Paul Corliss, from Christchurch, a life member of the Rail and Maritime Transport Union; Christine Dann, from Banks Peninsula, a writer and researcher; Bryan Gould, from Bay of Plenty, a former Waikato University Vice-Chancellor and deputy leader of the British Labour Party.

Also Joce Jesson, a Senior Lecturer in Critical Studies in Education, University of Auckland and an activist in various community organisations; and Wayne Hope, Associate Professor, Communications Studies, Auckland University of Technology.

The winner(s) will be announced at a Wellington event on March 11

No Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.