Bishop Out Of Order And Out of Office? – Kāpiti and Coast Independent

The situation of Deputy Prime Minister, Barnaby Joyce, must now have made it obvious to the Turnbull government that if it survives it will have to begin the process of amending the constitution provisions on the eligibility of MPs. Sydney Morning Herald August 15 2017

Salvos across the Tasman

By Roger Childs

Australian Foreign Minister, Julie Bishop, has become a respected figure on the world scene in recent years, but has tipped the ink pot on her copybook over Joyce’s potential resignation over partial New Zealand citizenship.

Obviously the two cross-Tasman Labo(u)r parties didn’t consult over the issue, but it was the Australian media who have put the skids under their deputy prime minister.

Bishop went over the top accusing New Zealand of interfering in Australia’s internal affairs.

The mouth that roared

New Zealand is facing an election. Should there be a change of government, I would find it very hard to build trust with those involved in allegations designed to undermine the government of Australia. Julie Bishop

One wonders if Bishop ran her views past the prime minster before talking to a reporter.

The realities of the situation are that MPs are only allowed to sit in the Canberra parliament if they are solely Australian citizens. Joyce is the fifth MP to have breached section 44 of the constitution and some have already resigned.

As the Sydney paper said in its editorial, a review of the provisions is overdue.

But why did Bishop sound off about political interference from across the ditch?

Well, the right wing Liberal-Country Party government has a razor thin majority and if Barnaby Joyce goes, it’s crisis time.

If the government fell, Bishop might well lose her well-paid, influential job. However this hardly justifies her ridiculous comments about New Zealand trying to undermine the Australian government.

If Australian politicians are ineligible to sit in parliament under their constitutional rules that’s reality. Two senators have already resigned.

Return to Home Page

100 Years Ago — and the Maori Long March begins

Māori politics was dominated by the influential MPs (and sometime Cabinet ministers) Māui Pōmare ( Waitara statue photo above) and Apirana Ngata.

The 1920's also saw the rise of Tahupōtiki Wiremu Rātana’s religious movement, and the emergence of Te Puea Hērangi in Waikato.

Ngata worked hard to foster Māori scholarship and education and preserve traditional arts and culture.

He convinced the government to establish a Board of Maori Ethnological Research (1923), a Maori Purposes Fund Control Board (1924) and a School of Maori Arts and Crafts in Rotorua (1927).

The Reform government also took the first, tentative steps towards settling longstanding Māori grievances.

Agreements with Te Arawa in 1922 and Ngāti Tūwharetoa in 1926 recognised their respective rights over the Rotorua lakes and Lake Taupō, and led to the establishment of trust boards with some government funding.

Commissions of inquiry which examined Ngāi Tahu grievances (1920–21) and the Waikato and Taranaki confiscations (1926–27) recommended that modest compensation be paid.